Challenger 3 conversion set

Webley
How do you know it's a defective product?

Кирилл Трифан 著者
We are now living in a time when plastic from top companies is almost always better than resin
[img1]
Look at the photo—even if we ignore the fact that the barrel appears crooked due to the crooked photo and the turret is not flat, at a minimum the cheekbone plates should not be arched at the edges.
[img2]
Compare with the photo, + are the optics either closed or made without the ability to make them look pretty: the photo doesn't show either the transparent part or the groove for the sequin

Кирилл Трифан 著者
Since I'm a fan of modern MBTs, I'd really like a Challenger 3, but I won't buy one for who knows what price.

Webley
Thanks for the interesting comments.

There definitely are photographs of a C3 turret with the chamfered edges (arched as you wrote) to the turret - similar to how Newland Models show it. There's also definitely photographs of a turrets with square edges (as you say they should be). I wonder if the earliest prototype had the chamfered edges & the later ones square edges?

I agree, for large assemblies such as tank turrets the top companies are producing quality that difficult to beat.