Wall

John
Haha Nigel, I was thinking that we definitely needed another Tiger I kit. Can't hardly find one for love or money these days. Perhaps one day there will be more brands of Tiger I kits available than actual Tiger Is produced.

Peter van Buren
Or is this just the software for a 3D printer..?

gorby
😄 😄 😄

scalemates
Thx Nigel!

Basic rules** (**never a black/white thing)

- it depends which kit was released first. (eg. one 2 months before the other = easy)
- if they are both released at the same time the first number (eg. 35001 vs 35002) is the new tool
- if that is still the same or difficult. (eg if one has a label "Deluxe" version and the other not, the one without it is the new tool)
- if that is still the same or difficult. (eg if one has a label "Minimal" version and the other not, the one without it is the new tool)
- Consistency with previous (clearer) releases can also be a good thing
- If that is still doubtful or it is the first entry = pick one or the other 🙂

My view here: Let us start with consistency ; similar to:
AH-1W interior 3D decals (Quinta Studio QDS-35153, 1:35)
AH-1W interior 3D decals (wi..uinta Studio QD+35153, 1:35)

Knowing the person who made the change that was likely the reasoning as well

If we have solid arguments to do it the other way around I will bulk fix all Quinta entries 🙂

Nigel Author
Thanks. I just seems to me that in a case of 'new thing' and 'new thing plus additional parts', the former is minimal and the latter almost comes into the deluxe version territory. So that 'new thing' is a new tool, and 'new thing plus additional parts' is the very definition of new parts.

Thus, the way it currently is with this product not only makes no sense, it actually breaks with the guidelines stated above.